Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: AMPHIBIA 3000 GRIP 1.6 (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location IT
Geographical representativeness description global
Reference year 2022
Name
AMPHIBIA 3000 GRIP 1.6
Use advice for data set Cradle to gate with options: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, C1, C2, C3, C4, D
Technical purpose of product or process The study is carried out for VOLTECO AMPHIBIA products belonging to the company's 'Synthetic Hydro-reactive Membranes' range. AMPHIBIA is composed of a continuous multilayer co-extruded polymer layer, with differentiated functionality for a total watertightness of the underground structures from water infiltration. It is made of 3 layers with differentiated expansive capacity. It is also equipped on the interface that comes into contact with the concrete with a non-woven fabric that allows mechanical adhesion of the membrane to the structure. AMPHIBIA is used for waterproofing and protecting concrete structures built in the subsoil of residential and nonresidential buildings, where intimate and continuous contact between the waterproofing agent and the structure. It can also be used in other structures such as canals, reservoirs, sewage treatment plants, tunnels, and in moisture protection for concrete structures built at ground level such as sub-floor screeds. AMPHIBIA is a pre-cast, water-reactive, self-healing, self-sealing and self-adhering waterproof epdm membrane to concrete. It is composed of a continuous multilayer co-extruded polymeric membrane with differentiated functionality for a total watertightness of underground structures from water infiltration. It is made of 3 layers with differentiated expansion capacity with the following characteristics: - TIGHT BARRIER, watertight layer; - CORE, super-expansive safety layer that is self-sealing and self-repairing even in the event of a puncture; - ACTIVE BARRIER, water-reactive layer with controlled expansion, prevents lateral water migration and seals overlaps. It is also equipped on the interface that comes into contact with the concrete with a non-woven fabric that enables the mechanical adhesion of the membrane to the structure. Main materials and substances in percentage and active ingredient: AMPHIBIA 3000 Grip 1.6 and 1.3: EPDM rubber and calcium carbonate >50%. Main active ingredient AMPHIBIA 1.6 and 1.3: Super-absorbent polymer
General comment on data set The data are site-specific data for quantities (raw materials, packaging, waste, energy consumption, distances to suppliers/customers). For the site-specific data, the year 2021 was considered. Data collection was easy as the company is ISO 14001 certified. Generic data extracted from databases were selected on the basis of their geographical, technological and temporal representativeness. The data quality analysis, carried out according to Annex E of the EN 15804:2012+A2:2019, showed a data quality of 'Fair' level or higher. In this work we have allocated between AMPHIBIA 1.6 and 1.3: - the electricity consumption data of the membrane factory. The membrane factory also contains a production line not related to the production of AMPHIBIA. To avoid attributing its consumption to AMPHIBIA products, it was estimated by means of power data and hours of use. The allocations between the different AMPHIBIA thicknesses for the energy consumption attributable to them were then made on a mass basis (kg products); - the waste produced by the production process from the membrane department: raw material and additive waste, EPDM liner (waste from Amphibia) and water/sludge degassing. Waste was allocated on a mass basis (kg produced) for raw material waste and degassing. On the other hand, EPDM sheaths were allocated on a kg basis (waste). Similar allocation was then replicated for waste transport and end-of-life disposal; - The amount of waste common to the two processes related to packaging (waste pots, reels, sacks), allocated on a mass basis (kg produced). Similar allocation was, consequently, replicated for the waste transport and end-of-life disposal; - The amount of ink for printing the AMPHIBIA surface and the solvent used for the cleaning of the printer, allocated on the basis of the m2 products. Within the Ponzano site, there is also another production department (powder and resin department). With this department the following consumptions are in common: - Warehouse electricity: allocated on the basis of quantities produced (kg, not considering waste because it is not stored in the warehouse). The warehouse shares the meter with the offices the meter. In order to extrapolate the energy consumption only of the warehouse, an energy analysis was carried out to estimate the consumption of the electricity vector on the basis of the energy uses (lights, forklifts, etc.) present there. The cut-off criteria are 1 per cent of the renewable and non-renewable primary energy utilisation and 1 per cent of the total mass input of a unit process. The total input flows disregarded per module, e.g. for modules A1-A3, A4-A5, B1-B5, B6-B7, C1-C4 and module D must be a maximum of 5% of energy and mass utilisation. A cut-off (<1% by mass) was made regarding: - Instruction sheet inserted in the packaging - Label attached to the packaging The cut -off for the process unit 'Packaging' was 0.25% for AMPHIBIA 1.6 and 0.24% for AMPHIBIA 1.3, and for both products <5% for module A3.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2027
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 774
  • 0.59
  • 147
  • 0.487
  • 1.13
  • 0
  • 0.0228
  • 0
  • 0.27
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 774
  • 0.59
  • 147
  • 0.487
  • 1.13
  • 0
  • 0.0228
  • 0
  • 0.27
  • 0
Input
  • 1.45E+4
  • 426
  • 238
  • 368
  • 30.6
  • 0
  • 17.7
  • 0
  • 12.5
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.45E+4
  • 426
  • 238
  • 368
  • 30.6
  • 0
  • 17.7
  • 0
  • 12.5
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 8.1
  • 0.000675
  • 0.313
  • 0.000904
  • 0.0362
  • 0
  • 0.000231
  • 0
  • 0.00139
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00602
  • 0.00106
  • 0.00038
  • 0.000763
  • 0.0000511
  • 0
  • 0.0000447
  • 0
  • 0.0000252
  • 0
Output
  • 44.3
  • 0.0212
  • 2.45
  • 0.0232
  • 0.313
  • 0
  • 0.00298
  • 0
  • 168
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0525
  • 0.00291
  • 0.00088
  • 0.00251
  • 0.0000434
  • 0
  • 0.00012
  • 0
  • 0.0000744
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1.36E+4
  • 401
  • 223
  • 347
  • 28.5
  • 0
  • 16.7
  • 0
  • 11.8
  • 0
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00265
  • 0.0000012
  • 0.0000022
  • 8.83E-7
  • 0.00000425
  • 0
  • 6.09E-8
  • 0
  • 3.7E-8
  • 0
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 2.36
  • 0.0979
  • 0.0682
  • 0.294
  • 0.00818
  • 0
  • 0.00414
  • 0
  • 0.00828
  • 0
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.0001
  • 0.00000657
  • 0.00000238
  • 0.00000567
  • 3.24E-7
  • 0
  • 2.7E-7
  • 0
  • 1.58E-7
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0162
  • 0.0000154
  • 0.00131
  • 0.0000163
  • 0.0000326
  • 0
  • 0.00000183
  • 0
  • 0.0000111
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.359
  • 0.0315
  • 0.0205
  • 0.0845
  • 0.00226
  • 0
  • 0.00132
  • 0
  • 0.00342
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 3.99
  • 0.346
  • 0.191
  • 0.935
  • 0.024
  • 0
  • 0.0145
  • 0
  • 0.0375
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 11.6
  • 0.0226
  • -6.17
  • 0.0187
  • 14
  • 0
  • 0.000885
  • 0
  • 0.0185
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 566
  • 28.3
  • 20.4
  • 25.1
  • 3.81
  • 0
  • 1.18
  • 0
  • 0.887
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.297
  • 0.000214
  • 0.273
  • 0.000218
  • 0.000803
  • 0
  • 0.0000127
  • 0
  • 0.000323
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 577
  • 28.3
  • 14.5
  • 25.1
  • 17.8
  • 0
  • 1.18
  • 0
  • 0.906
  • 0
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 1.79
  • 0.0944
  • 0.0486
  • 0.243
  • 0.00712
  • 0
  • 0.00395
  • 0
  • 0.0104
  • 0
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 288
  • -0.085
  • 10.1
  • -0.067
  • 1.21
  • 0
  • 0.00159
  • 0
  • 0.0287
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.69E+4
  • 1.6E+2
  • 413
  • 131
  • 34.4
  • 0
  • 7.1
  • 0
  • 8.53
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.16E-7
  • 2.28E-9
  • 1.75E-8
  • 2.38E-9
  • 2E-9
  • 0
  • 9.8E-11
  • 0
  • 1.01E-10
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.00000437
  • 2.65E-7
  • 2.06E-7
  • 1.92E-7
  • 4.45E-8
  • 0
  • 1.11E-8
  • 0
  • 7.39E-9
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 43.2
  • 1.77
  • 0.782
  • 1.52
  • 0.0391
  • 0
  • 0.0725
  • 0
  • 0.051
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.06E+3
  • 1.28
  • 742
  • 1.15
  • 2.27
  • 0
  • 0.0762
  • 0
  • 29.4
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0000233
  • 0.00000184
  • 8.51E-7
  • 0.00000154
  • 7.54E-8
  • 0
  • 7.61E-8
  • 0
  • 2.05E-7
  • 0